Why revenue per employee matters

Home > Back

Why revenue per employee matters

Array
Array
Michael
117
test test
Background
Vice President
Specialties
Michael
0
marketingstrategy_Blog_image

There are lots of reasons to look at revenue per employee (RPE). It is a good benchmark for evaluating the efficiency of firms that operate in the same sector. For example, RPE will be less in people-intensive sectors (e.g. Retail, Professional Services) than in capital-intensive sectors (mining, technology).

The arithmetic for deriving it is simple:

Revenue per Employee = Total Revenue (Sales) / Total number of employees.
Yet, the arithmetic on its own merits doesn’t say anything about why RPE matters. This is why it matters:

all other things being equal, the higher the RPE for a firm the higher the valuation the market – and potential buyers for a privately held firm – will place on it.
It’s a nice ratio that levels the playing field, and enables the efficiency of firms to be measured within a sector (apples to apples). The higher the RPE, the greater the likelihood of showing satisfactory profits. In technology and software firms, for example, $150,000 revenue per employee is a benchmark. The lower the RPE of a firm, the lower the price a buyer will be willing to pay (e.g. a RPE of $80K is especially bad in a place like Silicon Valley). The higher the RPE, the higher the price a buyer will likely pay (e.g. if the RPE is $500K, buyers will pay attention). Many factors determine the price a buyer will pay! Revenue per Employee is one quick benchmark that buyers use to qualify their interest.

So, if you own a privately held firm that you plan to sell to retire, then you’ll want to ensure that you have a high Revenue per Employee relative to others in the industry (that could theoretically be purchased).

What drives RPE?

While there are many factors, here are a five to consider:

  1. Business sector – a company in a “hot” business sector will attract demand for its offerings, e.g. cloud, mobile enablement
  2. A company’s competitive “moat” – its offerings are uniquely differentiated in the market, can command a high price and margin, and are difficult for competitors to match in the short term
  3. Skilled employees – a cadre of functionally skilled, effective employees inevitably gets more home runs than the competition. Plus, they are hard to find to begin with.
  4. Management – knowing how to attract and retain a productive team, and to coax efficiencies – and margin – out of work processes.
  5. Marketing – having a great offering at a great price does nothing if it is not promoted effectively to the right markets in the right way.
Demand generation 101 bookDemand generation 101 book

Get the Strategies

Get the latest posts delivered to your inbox for free.

Written by Michael

Michael Douglas has held senior positions in sales, marketing and general management since 1980, and spent 20 years at Sun Microsystems, most recently as VP, Global Marketing. His experience includes start-ups, mid-market and enterprises. He's currently VP Enterprise Go-to-Market for NVIDIA.

Subscribe to Forward Weekly

Leave a Reply

avatar